{"schemas":[{"sector_schema_id":"automotive_collision.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Automotive Collision Assessment","description":"Domain coverage schema for automated collision force, damage, and consequence assessments in the automotive sector.","domain_count":8,"domains":[{"domain_id":"physics_impact_force","description":"Mass, velocity, deceleration, and structural force calculations"},{"domain_id":"vehicle_structural_integrity","description":"Crumple zone, chassis deformation modeling"},{"domain_id":"occupant_biological_impact","description":"Estimated injury severity to human occupants (AIS scale or equivalent)"},{"domain_id":"pedestrian_third_party_impact","description":"Risk to people outside the vehicle (pedestrians, cyclists, other road users)"},{"domain_id":"psychological_trauma_risk","description":"Post-incident psychological impact on occupants and witnesses"},{"domain_id":"financial_liability_estimate","description":"Repair cost, total-loss threshold, and insurance claim magnitude"},{"domain_id":"regulatory_reporting_obligation","description":"Whether the incident triggers mandatory reporting to traffic authorities or insurers"},{"domain_id":"environmental_impact","description":"Fuel/battery leakage, coolant spill, and road-hazard contamination"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"credit_lending_decision.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Credit & Lending Decision","description":"Domain coverage schema for automated or AI-assisted credit scoring, loan approval, and lending risk assessment systems.","domain_count":7,"domains":[{"domain_id":"income_debt_ratio","description":"Core affordability calculation (DTI, disposable income, repayment capacity)"},{"domain_id":"credit_history_score","description":"Traditional bureau-based scoring (FICO, Schufa, Experian, etc.)"},{"domain_id":"alternative_data_signals","description":"Non-traditional signals used (transaction behavior, utility payments, open-banking data)"},{"domain_id":"discriminatory_proxy_check","description":"Whether protected-characteristic proxy variables (zip code, name patterns) were audited"},{"domain_id":"life_event_context","description":"Whether temporary circumstances (job loss, medical event) were distinguished from structural risk"},{"domain_id":"explainability_available","description":"Whether an adverse-action explanation can be generated for the applicant"},{"domain_id":"regulatory_compliance_basis","description":"Which regulation (GDPR Art. 22, ECOA, CCPA, local consumer credit law) governs this decision"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"cyntra_wp1_evidence_event.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Cyntra WP1 Evidence Event","description":"Minimal domain coverage schema for the Cyntra Insights WP1 pilot evidence events.\n\nThis schema is limited to the declared evidence boundary of the pilot and does\n\nnot establish decision correctness, governance completeness, policy compliance,\n\nlawfulness, fairness, or global completeness.","domain_count":3,"domains":[{"domain_id":"governance_state_declaration","description":"Declared Cyntra runtime governance state associated with the evidence event."},{"domain_id":"human_review_state","description":"Declared state of whether human review was actually completed for the evidence event."},{"domain_id":"evidence_event_linkage","description":"References and commitments used to correlate the Cyntra evidence event with the resulting Decision Receipt."}]},{"sector_schema_id":"generic_fallback.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Generic Fallback","description":"Minimal domain coverage schema for use when no sector-specific schema applies yet. Its presence on a receipt is itself a signal that a proper sector schema should be authored for this use case.","domain_count":4,"domains":[{"domain_id":"primary_computed_output","description":"The core function this system computes (the 'what')"},{"domain_id":"input_data_provenance","description":"Whether inputs were authenticated at the source"},{"domain_id":"human_review_availability","description":"Whether a human can review or override this decision"},{"domain_id":"known_limitations_disclosed","description":"Free-form field for limitations not yet formalized into a domain-specific schema"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"hr_recruitment_employment.v1","version":"1.0","title":"HR, Recruitment & Employment","description":"Domain coverage schema for AI-assisted candidate screening, hiring recommendations, and employment decision systems.","domain_count":7,"domains":[{"domain_id":"qualification_skill_match","description":"Resume/skills-to-role matching (keyword extraction, semantic similarity, experience mapping)"},{"domain_id":"protected_characteristic_bias_check","description":"Audit against gender, age, ethnicity, disability, and other legally protected proxies"},{"domain_id":"interview_performance_signal","description":"Structured interview data incorporated (scoring rubrics, behavioural indicators)"},{"domain_id":"internal_mobility_context","description":"Whether internal candidates were weighted differently from external applicants"},{"domain_id":"explainability_for_rejection","description":"Whether a candidate can receive a reason for rejection"},{"domain_id":"human_reviewer_involvement","description":"Whether a human reviewed the recommendation before final rejection"},{"domain_id":"jurisdictional_employment_law_basis","description":"Applicable local labor law compliance basis (EEA, US Title VII, local equivalents)"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"industrial_iot_safety.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Industrial IoT & Safety Systems","description":"Domain coverage schema for automated safety decisions in industrial IoT environments (manufacturing, energy, logistics).","domain_count":6,"domains":[{"domain_id":"sensor_reading_accuracy","description":"Core measurement accuracy and threshold calculation (calibration, signal-to-noise)"},{"domain_id":"sensor_data_provenance","description":"Authentication that the reading came from the claimed device, unaltered in transit"},{"domain_id":"human_operator_proximity_risk","description":"Whether nearby worker safety was modeled (exclusion zones, lockout/tagout status)"},{"domain_id":"equipment_degradation_context","description":"Whether wear, maintenance history, and remaining-useful-life were factored in"},{"domain_id":"cascading_failure_risk","description":"Whether the decision considered downstream system effects (domino scenarios)"},{"domain_id":"regulatory_safety_threshold_basis","description":"Which safety standard (ISO 13849, IEC 61508, OSHA equivalent) the threshold is based on"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"insurance_underwriting_claims.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Insurance Underwriting & Claims","description":"Domain coverage schema for automated insurance underwriting, premium calculation, and claims adjudication systems.","domain_count":7,"domains":[{"domain_id":"risk_actuarial_calculation","description":"Core premium/payout math (loss frequency × severity, exposure rating)"},{"domain_id":"claim_fraud_signal_check","description":"Fraud-pattern screening (anomaly detection, known-fraud indicators)"},{"domain_id":"policyholder_history_context","description":"Prior claims, tenure, loyalty, and risk-modification history"},{"domain_id":"third_party_liability_assessment","description":"Impact on other parties (subrogation, bodily-injury liability, third-party claims)"},{"domain_id":"catastrophic_correlated_risk","description":"Whether the claim is part of a correlated event (flood, wildfire, cyber-attack affecting a region)"},{"domain_id":"human_hardship_context","description":"Whether claimant's circumstantial hardship was considered in claims handling"},{"domain_id":"data_provenance_of_inputs","description":"Whether input evidence (photos, sensor data, repair estimates) was authenticated"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"legal_judicial_risk_assessment.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Legal & Judicial Risk Assessment","description":"Domain coverage schema for automated recidivism scoring, bail/sentencing recommendations, and pre-trial risk assessments.","domain_count":6,"domains":[{"domain_id":"statistical_recidivism_model","description":"Core actuarial or ML-based risk score calculation (COMPAS-like instruments)"},{"domain_id":"case_specific_context","description":"Circumstances specific to this case vs. population base-rate statistics"},{"domain_id":"demographic_bias_check","description":"Audit against protected-characteristic proxy variables (race, socioeconomic status)"},{"domain_id":"procedural_rights_notice","description":"Whether the subject was notified that an automated tool was used in their assessment"},{"domain_id":"human_judicial_override","description":"Whether a judge or authorized human reviewed and can override the algorithmic recommendation"},{"domain_id":"data_provenance_of_inputs","description":"Authentication and accuracy verification of criminal-record data sources"}]},{"sector_schema_id":"medical_diagnosis_support.v1","version":"1.0","title":"Medical Diagnosis Support","description":"Domain coverage schema for AI-assisted clinical decision support systems producing diagnostic suggestions or triage recommendations.","domain_count":8,"domains":[{"domain_id":"symptom_pattern_match","description":"Statistical or model-based match between reported symptoms and candidate conditions"},{"domain_id":"lab_imaging_data_review","description":"Whether quantitative test data (lab panels, imaging reports) was incorporated"},{"domain_id":"patient_history_context","description":"Prior conditions, chronic disease history, medication interactions"},{"domain_id":"differential_diagnosis_coverage","description":"Whether alternative explanations were checked, not just the top match"},{"domain_id":"demographic_bias_check","description":"Whether model performance was validated across the patient's demographic group"},{"domain_id":"urgency_triage_level","description":"Whether time-criticality (STAT vs. routine) was assessed"},{"domain_id":"clinician_override_availability","description":"Whether a human clinician reviewed or can review the AI output before action"},{"domain_id":"data_provenance_of_inputs","description":"Whether input data source was authenticated (links to Signatrust core layer)"}]}]}